The exact system I used to ship four apps solo. No coding. No team. You describe the feature. AI does the schema, writes the code, commits to GitHub, builds the app.
This usually starts as a quick conversation with AI, then turns into one clean prompt.
You describe one sentence. Claude creates the database, writes the code, commits to GitHub.
I'm Leander Toney. I build and ship apps on my own, from my laptop.
TasteLanc started as an idea and became a working app with 875 users and $8,640 in its first 90 days. I launched TasteCumberland with the same process, then sold my stake inside a year. Now I'm building Court Crowd the same way.
No team. No long timelines. Just a repeatable way of building and shipping.
The apps were sold. The system that built them wasn't. That's what this playbook shows.
Leander Toney · Universole App Studios
You describe one sentence. Claude creates the database, writes the code, commits to GitHub.
First screen running on your actual device in the first hour. Not a demo. Not a tutorial. Your idea, live.
Describe → Refine → Delegate → Observe → Redirect → Ship. Most people build loops that break on Day 3. This one doesn't.
You describe one sentence. Claude creates the database, writes the code, wires the keys, commits to GitHub. This is the prompt that turned 30 hours of setup into 30 seconds.
Which tools you set up once, which tools AI handles forever. Getting this line wrong is why most "AI coding" guides leave you exhausted.
EAS build. Submission. OTA updates. I submit once. Every update after ships in seconds, no re-submission.
Prompt 01 alone is worth the price. One sentence of intent → full feature built, schema created, code committed. You don't touch the database. You don't write a line of SQL.
The end-to-end Agent Mode prompt. Schema, code, commit. One paste.
Day 1. Your first screen running on your own phone in under an hour.
Error? Paste the red text. Claude fixes the root cause, not the symptom.
Turns "working app" into "app I'd pay for." Typography, spacing, empty states, loading, errors. All in one pass.
The submission walkthrough. Both stores, one step at a time, nothing skipped.
26 pages. Built to get you to a working app.
Setup → The Loop → Prompts → Ship.
No filler. Read it in under an hour and start building immediately.
Real screenshots. Real revenue. From apps actually shipped.
Read the playbook. Work the 7 days. Didn't ship? Book a call. We figure it out.
No. The whole point is you describe, AI builds. You copy the prompts, paste them into Claude, and run the commands the playbook gives you. That's the job.
Apple Developer ($99/yr) and Google Play ($25 one-time) if you're shipping to the stores. Claude Code runs on the $20/month Claude Pro plan. ChatGPT, Expo, GitHub, and Supabase all have free tiers that are enough to build and test the full app. No hidden subscriptions.
Neither. It's a 26-page PDF plus a 7-page bonus prompt pack. Read once. Ship. Under an hour of reading, not weeks of videos.
Instant download on the success page and a copy emailed to you within seconds, so you always have the link. Both files delivered at checkout.
If your idea is a mobile app with screens, data, and users, the answer is yes. The system is the same whether you're building a food discovery app or a poker tool. The playbook shows both.